USPTO serial 79100752
KX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4333225Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 14, 2013
- Examiner
- SETTLES LEWIS, SHAILA E
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with KX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Hertfordshire EN8 9SL, GB
Hertfordshire EN8 9SL, GB
GB
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David A. W. Wong
David A. W. Wong Barnes & Thonrburg, LLP11 S. Meridian StIndianapolis, IN 46204-3535UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 032 | Mineral and aerated and effervescing waters; non-alcoholic fruit juice beverages; non-alcoholic beverages, namely, carbonated beverages; fruit juices; syrups and essences for making non-alcoholic beverages; isotonic beverages | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 1, 2022 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 1, 2022 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Oct 17, 2020 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Sep 21, 2020 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 21, 2020 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Aug 20, 2020 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Dec 20, 2019 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Jun 7, 2019 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 12, 2018 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 26, 2018 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| May 14, 2018 | REM3 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 18, 2016 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Feb 1, 2014 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 15, 2014 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 15, 2014 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Aug 14, 2013 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 14, 2013 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Apr 28, 2013 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 5, 2013 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 1, 2013 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 26, 2013 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 26, 2013 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 11, 2013 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 6, 2013 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 6, 2013 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 6, 2013 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 23, 2013 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 23, 2013 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 18, 2013 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 15, 2013 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 14, 2013 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 24, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 23, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 23, 2012 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 19, 2012 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Nov 16, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 15, 2012 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 15, 2012 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 15, 2012 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 24, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 23, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 23, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 23, 2012 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 23, 2012 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 20, 2011 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 31, 2011 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 31, 2011 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Oct 29, 2011 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Oct 28, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 28, 2011 | RFWR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) WITHDRAWN FOR REVIEW | — |
| Sep 28, 2011 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Sep 27, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 27, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 23, 2011 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Aug 19, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 18, 2011 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |