Drawing for CORPORATE VALUE ASSOCIATES

USPTO serial 79100844

CORPORATE VALUE ASSOCIATES

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
WHITE, RICHARD F
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 109 - SLIE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CORPORATE VALUE ASSOCIATES?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Organizational and business consulting; company consulting, business valuation services, company management assistanceSECTION 70 - CANCELLED
036Financial appraisals, analyses and transactions; investment of funds; fiscal valuations and assessments; lease-purchasingSECTION 70 - CANCELLED
042Engineer's office servicesSECTION 70 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 7, 2018DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED
Jul 6, 2018DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
May 15, 2015NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Jun 5, 2014NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Apr 20, 2013FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Apr 1, 2013FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Mar 31, 2013FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Feb 11, 2013OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB
Jan 23, 2013OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Jan 23, 2013OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Apr 2, 2012MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 31, 2012ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Sep 24, 2011RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Sep 2, 2011RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Sep 2, 2011RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Sep 2, 2011RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Sep 1, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 26, 2011MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED
Aug 22, 2011CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB
Aug 22, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Aug 22, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Aug 18, 2011SDRCSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance