USPTO serial 79100970
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Ann K. Ford
Ann K. Ford DLA Piper LLP (US)500 8th Street NWWashington, DC 20004UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Fiber-optical components included in this class, in the nature of electrical apparatus related to lighting, namely, glass fiber harnesses glass fiber cables, glass fiber light guides, glass fiber light conducting rods | ACTIVE | — |
| 010 | Fiber-optical components for medical and dental apparatus, namely, rigid fiber optic rods in different shapes, medical fiber cables, light guides, flexible optical fibers and fiber bundles, all specifically designed for use in dentistry, surgery, endoscopy, and light therapy equipment | ACTIVE | — |
| 021 | Semi-finished glass fibers, namely, glass fibers for non-textile purposes | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 22, 2023 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 22, 2023 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Jan 21, 2023 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 18, 2022 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 11, 2021 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 16, 2021 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Jan 14, 2019 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 14, 2019 | C75A | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jan 9, 2019 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 26, 2018 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 8, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 15, 2013 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 15, 2013 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Mar 11, 2013 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 11, 2012 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 25, 2012 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 25, 2012 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 5, 2012 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 5, 2012 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 5, 2012 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 23, 2012 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 22, 2012 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 21, 2012 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 21, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 6, 2012 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 24, 2012 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| May 3, 2012 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 3, 2012 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 12, 2012 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 12, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 10, 2012 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 6, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 26, 2012 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 5, 2011 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 20, 2011 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 20, 2011 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Oct 20, 2011 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Oct 19, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 18, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 30, 2011 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Aug 26, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 25, 2011 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |