USPTO serial 79101109
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 032 | Aperitifs, non-alcoholic; waters; kvass (non-alcoholic beverages); cocktails, non-alcoholic, including energy cocktails; lemonades; non-alcoholic beverages; non-alcoholic fruit juice beverages; milk of almonds (beverage); orgeat; beer; beer-based cocktails; sarsaparilla (soft drink); vegetable juices (beverages); fruit juices; sherbets (beverages) | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 033 | Aperitifs; arak; brandy; wine; whisky; vodka; gin; cocktails, including energy cocktails; liqueurs; alcoholic beverages, except beer; rum; sake; ciders | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 2, 2021 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| May 1, 2021 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Sep 7, 2017 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Dec 18, 2014 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 22, 2013 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 1, 2013 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 30, 2013 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 17, 2013 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 30, 2013 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 30, 2013 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 30, 2012 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 30, 2012 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 18, 2011 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 30, 2011 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 30, 2011 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Aug 30, 2011 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Aug 30, 2011 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Aug 29, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 26, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 26, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 25, 2011 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |