USPTO serial 79101316
PIMI
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4181368Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 31, 2012
- Examiner
- COLEMAN, CIMMERIAN
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PIMI?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Katrin Lewertoff and Michael A. Grow
Katrin Lewertoff and Michael A. Grow Ferdinand IP, LLC1221 Post Road East, Suite 302Westport, CT 06880UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Machines and machine tools, namely, deaerators, filling machines, palletizers, roller conveyors, shovel conveyors, screw conveyors, lump breakers, mixers, centrifugal sifters, bucket elevators, emptying machines, bag cutting and pressing machines, cutting machines, filtering machines and suction machines for industrial purposes, cooler screw machines, namely, a conveyor consisting of one or more screws in series with a heat exchange surface for drying solids, drier screw machines, namely, a conveyor consisting of one or more screws in series with a heat exchange surface for drying solids, all for use in plants for cosmetics, chemicals, food, agriculture, construction, water treatment, pharmaceuticals; packaging machines, vibrating screen separators; screw and vibratory feeders, for feeding liquids or solids to other parts of a production unit by agitating the product by means of a screw or vibration mechanism; propulsors, namely, drive units for pneumatic conveyance of solids | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 009 | Apparatus for testing gas, liquids and solids not for medical purposes | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 9, 2022 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 9, 2022 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Dec 25, 2020 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 3, 2020 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Dec 2, 2019 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 2, 2019 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Nov 8, 2019 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Aug 22, 2019 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 8, 2019 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Nov 7, 2017 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 31, 2017 | REM3 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 10, 2016 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 9, 2015 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 25, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 7, 2012 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 7, 2012 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Oct 31, 2012 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 31, 2012 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 15, 2012 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| May 15, 2012 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 25, 2012 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 9, 2012 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 9, 2012 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 9, 2012 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 9, 2012 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 9, 2012 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 9, 2012 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 9, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 15, 2012 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Mar 15, 2012 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 15, 2012 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 27, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 27, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 8, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 30, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 30, 2012 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 30, 2012 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 30, 2011 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 13, 2011 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 13, 2011 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Oct 13, 2011 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Oct 12, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 5, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 6, 2011 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Sep 2, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 1, 2011 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |