Drawing for ECO-FLEX

USPTO serial 79101360

ECO-FLEX

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 4273805Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jan 15, 2013
Examiner
BHANOT, KAPIL KUMAR
Law office
POST REGISTRATION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ECO-FLEX?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Stacey R. Halpern

STACEY R. HALPERN KNOBBE, MARTENS, OLSON & BEAR, LLP2040 MAIN ST FL 14IRVINE, CA 92614-8214UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Sanding machines; automatic sanding tools, namely, belt sanding machines, sanding pads for power-operated sanders, abrasive belts for power-operated sanders, abrasive disks for power-operated sanders, sanding heads for power-operated sanders; spraying machines, brushes being parts of machines; industrial robots [; hydro-pneumatic lifting work platforms; structural parts for all the afore-mentioned goods; none of the foregoing goods for use for ground cover application for controlling soil erosion, conditioning soil or providing seed protection ]SECTION 70 - CANCELLED
008Hand operated sanding tools, namely, brush backed sanding heads, sanding pads for non-electric, hand-operated sanders, sanding blocks; hand operated abrading tools, namely, brushes for abrading; structural parts for all the afore-mentioned goodsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 3, 2015DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED
Jul 3, 2015DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Feb 5, 2015ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB
Jan 14, 2015LIMELIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED AND ENTERED
Jan 14, 2015COC.CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED
Jan 14, 2015PLGLASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL
Jan 8, 2015LIMGLIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB
Nov 7, 2014NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
May 14, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Apr 22, 2013FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Apr 22, 2013FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED
Apr 15, 2013FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Jan 15, 2013R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Dec 10, 2012GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB
Dec 4, 2012ETOPEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED
Jul 30, 2012CHPBPOST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT - ENTERED
Jul 26, 2012APETASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF
Jul 20, 2012EPPATEAS POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT RECEIVED
Jun 14, 2012ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED
May 22, 2012NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED
May 22, 2012PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 16, 2012OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
May 16, 2012OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
May 2, 2012NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED
Apr 16, 2012PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Apr 16, 2012ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Apr 13, 2012CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Mar 29, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Mar 29, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Mar 28, 2012ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Mar 15, 2012TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 20, 2011RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Oct 27, 2011RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Oct 27, 2011RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Oct 27, 2011RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Oct 26, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 25, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Sep 10, 2011MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED
Sep 6, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Sep 2, 2011LIMILIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED
Sep 1, 2011REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance