USPTO serial 79101610
BIOCLAMP
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4166298Status 706Registered
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 3, 2012
- Examiner
- LOVELACE, JAMES B
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
Need help with BIOCLAMP?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Denmead, Hampshire PO7 6BZ, GB
Denmead, Hampshire PO7 6BZ, GB
Denmead, Hampshire, GB
GB
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Elisabeth Townsend Bridge
Elisabeth Townsend Bridge SMITHAMUNDSEN LLC330 EAST KILBOURN AVENUESUITE 1100, TOWER 1Milwaukee, WI 53202Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 017 | Non-metallic couplings for flexible pipes; non-metallic couplings for flexible pharmaceutical and laboratory hoses; non-metallic couplings for tubes; pipe connectors made of non-metallic materials for joining lengths of flexible pipe; joint couplings made of non-metallic materials for pipes; couplings of plastic for pipes; couplings of plastic for tubes; non-metallic couplings for tubes; non-metallic connectors for pipes; non-metallic couplings for pipes | ACTIVE | — |
| 020 | Non-metallic clamps for pipes other than parts of machines; clip clamps, not of metal; hinge clamps of non-metallic materials; non-metallic hose clamps; pipe clamps of plastics | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by BioPure Technology Limited
- Other trademarks owned by BioPure Technology Limited
- Other trademarks owned by BioPure Technology Limited
- Other trademarks owned by BioPure Technology Limited
- Other trademarks in Class 017
- Other trademarks in Class 020
- Similar marks named BIOCLAMP
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 12, 2026 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Dec 7, 2022 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 7, 2022 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Dec 7, 2022 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 25, 2022 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 27, 2022 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 3, 2021 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 1, 2021 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Aug 1, 2019 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 27, 2018 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 27, 2018 | C75A | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jul 19, 2018 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 2, 2018 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 3, 2017 | REM3 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 15, 2016 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 4, 2014 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 23, 2014 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 23, 2014 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 8, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 15, 2013 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 15, 2013 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Feb 28, 2013 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 2, 2012 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 3, 2012 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 3, 2012 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Apr 17, 2012 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 4, 2012 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 4, 2012 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 28, 2012 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 13, 2012 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 12, 2012 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 2, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 1, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 1, 2012 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 9, 2011 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 8, 2011 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 19, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 19, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 13, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 9, 2011 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 4, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 16, 2011 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 16, 2011 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Sep 16, 2011 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Sep 15, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 13, 2011 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Sep 9, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 9, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 8, 2011 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |