USPTO serial 79101705
STERICUT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4284350Status 706Registered
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Feb 5, 2013
- Examiner
- FINNEGAN, TIMOTHY
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
Need help with STERICUT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mainak H. Mehta
Mainak H. Mehta Procopio, Cory, Hargreaves & Savitch LLP525 B. Street, Suite 2200San Diego, CA 92101UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | apparatus, instruments and appliances all for surgical, medical and dental use, namely, electric, battery powered and pneumatic surgical drills, handpieces, dermatomes, saw and extraction systems, and parts and accessories therefor for use in orthopaedic and traumatic surgery, namely, reamers, battery packs, irrigation tools, blades, sternum saws, cast saws, hoses, wrenches; casting accessories, namely, blades, collection bags, underpadding scissors, plaster shears, cast spreaders; autopsy saws and accessories, namely, blades collection bags, debris bags; sterile apparatus, devices and instruments for single use and used for medical or surgical purposes, namely, blades, burrs, drills, k-wires, disposable pump sets for use with pulse lavage systems; disposable clothing or wear, namely, surgical gowns, surgical gloves, face masks, shoe covers; body wear, namely, coats, overalls, aprons, headwear, gloves, over sleeves; footwear, headwear; head coverings, namely, surgical caps, hairnets, hats, caps, nurse's headscarves; masks, namely, surgical masks; holloware, namely, metal bowls, pitchers, and trays, for use as containers or receptacles in medical applications; bowls; medical trays for surgical instruments, containers for medical waste; catheters, drills, blades and burrs, all for surgical, medical and dental use; structural parts for all the aforesaid goods | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 11, 2023 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 11, 2023 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Mar 11, 2023 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 9, 2022 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 5, 2022 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 25, 2021 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Feb 26, 2019 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 26, 2019 | C75A | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Feb 8, 2019 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 1, 2019 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 5, 2018 | REM3 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 25, 2013 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 25, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 6, 2013 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 6, 2013 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| May 5, 2013 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 5, 2013 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Nov 20, 2012 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 20, 2012 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 18, 2012 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 31, 2012 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 31, 2012 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 31, 2012 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 13, 2012 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 13, 2012 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 9, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 9, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 9, 2012 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 22, 2012 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Apr 22, 2012 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 22, 2012 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 26, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 26, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 19, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 5, 2012 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 5, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 5, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 5, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 9, 2011 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 19, 2011 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 19, 2011 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Sep 17, 2011 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Sep 17, 2011 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Sep 16, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 13, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 13, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 8, 2011 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |