USPTO serial 79101718
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
CONG TY CO PHAN VINH HOAN, (VINH HOAN CORPORATION)
Tinh Dong Thap, VN
Other trademarks owned by CONG TY CO PHAN VINH HOAN, (VINH HOAN CORPORATION)
CONG TY CO PHAN VINH HOAN, (VINH HOAN CORPORATION)
Tinh Dong Thap, VN
Other trademarks owned by CONG TY CO PHAN VINH HOAN, (VINH HOAN CORPORATION)
CONG TY CO PHAN VINH HOAN, (VINH HOAN CORPORATION)
Tinh Dong Thap, VN
Other trademarks owned by CONG TY CO PHAN VINH HOAN, (VINH HOAN CORPORATION)
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Stephen L. Baker
STEPHEN L. BAKER BAKER AND RANNELLS, PA92 E. Main Street., Suite 302Somerville, NJ 08876UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Frozen, canned and processed seafood; preserved, dried and cooked fruits and vegetables; jellies; jams; compote; eggs; milk; milk products excluding ice cream, ice milk and frozen yogurt; seafood soup | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 12, 2021 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 12, 2021 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Dec 20, 2019 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Nov 20, 2019 | XXSS | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 20, 2019 | XXCR | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED | — |
| Nov 1, 2019 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Mar 1, 2019 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Jul 24, 2017 | REM3 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| May 11, 2016 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 18, 2012 | FINV | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 29, 2012 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 29, 2012 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Oct 24, 2012 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 24, 2012 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 8, 2012 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| May 8, 2012 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 18, 2012 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 4, 2012 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 4, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 16, 2012 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 29, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 28, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 28, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 28, 2012 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 28, 2012 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 9, 2011 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 19, 2011 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 19, 2011 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Sep 17, 2011 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Sep 17, 2011 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Sep 16, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 14, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 13, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 8, 2011 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |