Drawing for VOL(T)AGE

USPTO serial 79101730

VOL(T)AGE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
FRENCH, CURTIS W
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with VOL(T)AGE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
025Clothing, footwear, headgear; scarves; sashes for wear; headbands; collars; mufflers; shawls; belts; Ascots; ready-made linings (parts of clothing); stoles; pocket squares; muffs; turbans; veils; money belts (clothing); necktiesSECTION 70 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 20, 2022DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED
Feb 19, 2022DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Jun 16, 2016ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB
Nov 30, 2013LIMGLIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB
Aug 4, 2013FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Aug 2, 2013NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Jul 8, 2013FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Jul 6, 2013FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Mar 2, 2013OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB
Mar 1, 2013NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Feb 13, 2013OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Feb 13, 2013OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Jul 6, 2012MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 6, 2012ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Dec 18, 2011RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Nov 29, 2011RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Nov 29, 2011RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Nov 29, 2011RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Nov 28, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 19, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Sep 17, 2011MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED
Sep 13, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Sep 9, 2011LIMILIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED
Sep 8, 2011REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance