Drawing for CROCBITE

USPTO serial 79101742

CROCBITE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 4137492Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
May 8, 2012
Examiner
DIXON, JENNIFER HAZARD
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CROCBITE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

James A. Oliff

JAMES A. OLIFF OLIFF PLCP.O. BOX 320850ALEXANDRIA, VA 22320-4850UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
006Metal connectors, fittings and couplings for hoses, pipes and flow lines; metal hydraulic hose and pipe connectors, fittings and couplings; metal pneumatic hose and pipe connectors, fittings and couplings; metal automatic air line couplings; metal hose and pipe adaptors for use with hose and pipe; metal hose and pipe assemblies incorporating any of the foregoing connectors, fittings and couplings; parts and accessories included in this class, namely, segmented metal coupling connectors and flexible metal coupling connectorsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 2, 2021DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED
Nov 2, 2021DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
May 8, 2021REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED
Feb 15, 2018NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED
Feb 15, 2018C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.
Nov 25, 2017APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL
Oct 20, 2017ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED
May 8, 2017REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED
Nov 27, 2012GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB
Nov 15, 2012FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Oct 22, 2012FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Oct 22, 2012FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED
Aug 8, 2012FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
May 8, 2012R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Feb 21, 2012NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED
Feb 21, 2012PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 8, 2012OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Feb 8, 2012OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Feb 1, 2012NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED
Jan 13, 2012PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Jan 13, 2012ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Dec 22, 2011CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Dec 21, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Dec 20, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Dec 20, 2011TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 20, 2011ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 20, 2011REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Oct 3, 2011RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Sep 17, 2011MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED
Sep 15, 2011RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Sep 15, 2011RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Sep 15, 2011RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Sep 14, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 13, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Sep 13, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Sep 8, 2011REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance