USPTO serial 79101895
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Rita E. Kline
Rita E. Kline Tarolli, Sundheim, Covell & Tummino LLP1300 East Ninth StreetSuite 1700CLEVELAND, OH 44114| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Swimming pool and spa cleaning and maintenance machines and equipments, namely, vacuum cleaners, automatic swimming pool cleaners and parts thereof; sweeping machines and power-operated sweeping apparatus for use in pools and spas; power-operated skimmers for cleaning pools and spas; pumps for machines | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 18, 2021 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Dec 18, 2021 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Nov 6, 2020 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 21, 2020 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Jan 27, 2020 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 27, 2020 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Jan 3, 2020 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| May 3, 2019 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| May 19, 2017 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 4, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 12, 2013 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 12, 2013 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Jan 2, 2013 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 2, 2012 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 22, 2012 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 17, 2012 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 27, 2012 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 27, 2012 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 27, 2012 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 12, 2012 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 12, 2012 | DMCC | DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 11, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 7, 2012 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 6, 2012 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - MAILED | — |
| Jun 6, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 6, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 6, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 6, 2012 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jun 6, 2012 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 18, 2012 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 18, 2012 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 9, 2011 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 23, 2011 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Sep 21, 2011 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 21, 2011 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Sep 21, 2011 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Sep 20, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 19, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 19, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 16, 2011 | LIMI | LIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Sep 15, 2011 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |