Drawing for KRUG

USPTO serial 79101944

KRUG

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 4192480Status 706Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Aug 21, 2012
Examiner
HABEEB, MYRIAH A
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.

Need help with KRUG?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Nancy DiConza

Nancy DiConza Fross Zelnick Lehrman & Zissu, P.C.151 West 42nd Street, 17th FloorNew York, NY 10036UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
033Champagne wines; sparkling winesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 5, 2022NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Dec 5, 202271AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Nov 22, 2022APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Jun 13, 2022ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Aug 21, 2021REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Aug 12, 2021RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Jan 30, 2020ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Aug 10, 2018NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Aug 10, 2018C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Aug 7, 2018APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Jul 19, 2018ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
Aug 21, 2017REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED—
May 23, 2017CORVREVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE - ADDRESS UPDATED—
Jan 31, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 26, 2013FINVFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 6, 2013FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Feb 6, 2013FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Dec 10, 2012GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 21, 2012FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Aug 21, 2012R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jun 5, 2012NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jun 5, 2012PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 16, 2012OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
May 16, 2012OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
May 16, 2012NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
May 2, 2012PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Apr 19, 2012CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 16, 2012XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Apr 16, 2012GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Apr 16, 2012GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Apr 16, 2012CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Mar 26, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 26, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 14, 2012ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 27, 2012TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 15, 2012ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 15, 2012REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Dec 11, 2011RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 23, 2011RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Nov 23, 2011RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Nov 22, 2011RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Nov 21, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 15, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 27, 2011MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Sep 21, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Sep 16, 2011LIMILIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED—
Sep 16, 2011REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance