USPTO serial 79102003
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
DEGUST KG s.a.s. des/di Baumgartner Johann & CO
IT
Other trademarks owned by DEGUST KG s.a.s. des/di Baumgartner Johann & CO
DEGUST KG s.a.s. des/di Baumgartner Johann & CO
IT
Other trademarks owned by DEGUST KG s.a.s. des/di Baumgartner Johann & CO
DEGUST KG s.a.s. des/di Baumgartner Johann & CO
IT
Other trademarks owned by DEGUST KG s.a.s. des/di Baumgartner Johann & CO
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Food products consisting of or including cheese as the predominant ingredient, namely, cheese and cheese spreads, in class 29 | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3, 2021 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Nov 3, 2021 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Jan 24, 2020 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Dec 31, 2019 | XXSS | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 31, 2019 | XXCR | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED | — |
| Nov 29, 2019 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Mar 29, 2019 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Dec 23, 2012 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 10, 2012 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 4, 2012 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 4, 2012 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Nov 28, 2012 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 28, 2012 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 12, 2012 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 23, 2012 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| May 23, 2012 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 23, 2012 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 9, 2012 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 9, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 4, 2012 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 3, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 3, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 3, 2012 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 26, 2012 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 25, 2012 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 21, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 21, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 8, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 17, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 18, 2011 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 27, 2011 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Sep 23, 2011 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 23, 2011 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Sep 23, 2011 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Sep 22, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 21, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 21, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 20, 2011 | LIMI | LIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Sep 19, 2011 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |