USPTO serial 79102189
TWINPASS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MORRIS, KRISTINA KLOIBER
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with TWINPASS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Scientific, nautical, surveying, electric, photographic, cinematographic, optical, weighing, measuring, signaling, checking (supervision), life-saving and teaching apparatus and instruments; apparatus for recording, transmission or reproduction of sound or images; magnetic data carriers, recording disks; automatic vending machines and mechanisms for coin-operated apparatus; cash registers, calculating machines, data processing equipment and computers; extinguishers; electric and electronic apparatus and instruments; electric and electronic apparatus and instruments for transmitting and receiving signals; electric and electronic alarm and security apparatus and instruments; automatic control and regulation apparatus and instruments, apparatus and instruments for information processing; solar cells; electric or electronic apparatus for operating gates, shutter holders, blinds, windows; solar-powered electric or electronic control and regulation apparatus and instruments; electronic apparatus and instruments, especially surveillance and monitoring apparatus and instruments for protecting people, buildings, apartments, houses, factories and offices; alarms and detectors; telephone transmitters, radios, sirens, transmitters, remote controls | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 26, 2014 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Sep 25, 2014 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| May 18, 2013 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 26, 2013 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 26, 2013 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 19, 2013 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 27, 2013 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 27, 2013 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 26, 2012 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 26, 2012 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 17, 2011 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 1, 2011 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Sep 29, 2011 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 29, 2011 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Sep 29, 2011 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Sep 28, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 27, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 27, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 26, 2011 | LIMI | LIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Sep 22, 2011 | SDRC | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB | — |