USPTO serial 79102213
DESIGN BASED STRATEGY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SAITO, KIM
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 102 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with DESIGN BASED STRATEGY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Business services in the field of the management and organisation of companies and public institutions; marketing studies, business management and organisation studies, business management system studies, business innovation studies; collection and systematization of information into computer databases, business inquiries; strategic business planning studies; company organisation consulting; market monitoring; promotional surveys; gathering of statistical data; organisation of data relating to business management; auditing; advertising plans; commercial consultancy; business, organisation, motivation and human resource reward system consultancy; administrative consultancy; psychological testing for the collection of personnel; search of personnel; cost analysis; definition of embedded value for clients; commercial and business consultancy on management of advisory boards and boards of directors; commercial and business consultancy on corporate governance; commercial and business consultancy on joint-ventures and on agency contracts or any other type of agreement either with persons or companies | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 041 | Training, instruction and staff refresher courses in the field of business management; organisation of conferences as well as of seminars, workshops, lectures and other similar educational meetings; arranging and conducting of workshops for training and refresher purposes | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 23, 2021 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Nov 22, 2021 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| May 25, 2013 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 9, 2013 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 9, 2013 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 23, 2013 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 6, 2013 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 6, 2013 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 9, 2012 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 9, 2012 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 30, 2011 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 12, 2011 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 12, 2011 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Oct 12, 2011 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Oct 11, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 4, 2011 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Sep 30, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 30, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 29, 2011 | LIMI | LIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Sep 29, 2011 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |