Drawing for ECONANO

USPTO serial 79102239

ECONANO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 4247873Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Nov 27, 2012
Examiner
VERHOSEK, WILLIAM T
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ECONANO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Mark Sommers

MARK SOMMERS FINNEGAN & HENDERSON ET. AL901 NEW YORK AVENUE, N.W.WASHINGTON, DC 20001UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016Labels, not of textile, namely, adhesive labels, bar code labels, paper labels, printed paper labels, paper linerless labels, printed paper linerless labels; seals, baggage tags; tags, namely, cardboard hang tags, paper tags, price tags, paper identification tags; stationery; paper; hand labeling appliances; label dispensers for household and stationery use; inking ribbonsSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 19, 2022DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Feb 19, 2022DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Jun 19, 2020INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
May 19, 2020INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
May 19, 2020INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Feb 28, 2020INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Jun 28, 2019C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Nov 27, 2017REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED—
Apr 1, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 9, 2013FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Mar 9, 2013FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Feb 27, 2013FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Dec 2, 2012GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 27, 2012R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Oct 19, 2012ETOPEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED—
Jul 2, 2012ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Jun 5, 2012NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jun 5, 2012PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 16, 2012OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
May 16, 2012OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
May 16, 2012NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
May 1, 2012PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Apr 23, 2012CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 23, 2012XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Apr 23, 2012GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Apr 23, 2012GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Apr 23, 2012CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Apr 11, 2012GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Apr 11, 2012GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 11, 2012CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 29, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 29, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 29, 2012ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 19, 2012TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 2, 2012ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Dec 24, 2011RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 2, 2011RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Dec 2, 2011RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Dec 1, 2011RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Nov 30, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 28, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 4, 2011MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Sep 30, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Sep 29, 2011REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance