USPTO serial 79102271
CLOUDBOX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MAI, TINA HSIN
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 108 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CLOUDBOX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computers, software; downloadable files and computer software; computer hardware and software designed to manage databases and addresses; computer software designed to encode and decode data; software for storing, accessing and managing data and multimedia content on computer networks; software for publishing data and for common access to data; software for participating in a decentralized storage system; data search software; rewritable devices for storing video, audio and images, namely hard disk drives; devices for storing digital images, namely blank digital storage media; computer hardware and software for collecting, publishing, organizing, modifying, locating, transmitting, storing, saving and sharing data and information; computer hardware and software for downloading, transferring and sharing audio, video and other multimedia content between devices on a network and devices sharing a common communications protocol; software and hardware for downloading, transferring and sharing audio, video and other multimedia content to wireless devices and between wireless devices | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | Telecommunications, communication via computer terminals; computer aided transmission of messages and images; electronic messaging, providing access for others to information indices online; providing access for others to data online within a decentralized computer storage system | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Design and development of computers; design, maintenance, development and updating of software; encoding and decoding of information and data (computer programming) for others, programming of data protection software for use in transmitting data electronically over global computer networks including the Internet; computer hardware consultancy; computer software consultancy; computer maintenance for others of data memory (software) within a decentralized computer storage system; providing data storage services online (hosting of files) | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 3, 2012 | IRRH | IRREGULARITY FROM IB EXAMINED BY MPU | — |
| Dec 23, 2011 | CORR | CORRECTION FROM IB ENTERED - NO REVIEW REQUIRED | — |
| Dec 17, 2011 | CRCV | CORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Dec 6, 2011 | IRRF | IRREGULARITY ON REFUSAL FROM IB | — |
| Nov 18, 2011 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 18, 2011 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Nov 17, 2011 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Nov 16, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 15, 2011 | RFWR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) WITHDRAWN FOR REVIEW | — |
| Nov 15, 2011 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Nov 14, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 13, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 4, 2011 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Sep 30, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 29, 2011 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |