Drawing for AVATAR

USPTO serial 79102372

AVATAR

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
HOFFMAN, DAVID AARON
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 107 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with AVATAR?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
031Agricultural and horticultural products, namely cut roses; natural plants and flowersSECTION 70 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 13, 2022DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED
Mar 12, 2022DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Dec 1, 2013FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Nov 8, 2013FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Nov 8, 2013FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Mar 23, 2013OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB
Mar 6, 2013OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Mar 6, 2013OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Nov 8, 2012MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 8, 2012ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 28, 2012CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 28, 2012CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 27, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Mar 27, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Mar 27, 2012TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 9, 2012RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Dec 15, 2011RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Dec 15, 2011RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Dec 15, 2011RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Dec 14, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 9, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Dec 8, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Oct 4, 2011MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED
Sep 30, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Sep 29, 2011REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance