Drawing for AUTO-RADIANT

USPTO serial 79102531

AUTO-RADIANT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 4228347Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Oct 23, 2012
Examiner
CROWLEY, SEAN MICHAEL
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with AUTO-RADIANT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Pamela B. Huff

Pamela B. Huff Cox Smith Matthews IncorporatedP.O. Box 2938Minneapolis, MN 55402UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003Cosmetics; perfumes; eau de toilette; eau de cologne; essential oils; soaps; beauty milks; deodorants for the body; creams, gels, milks, lotions, masks, pomades, skincare powders and preparations all being non-medicated skin care preparations; cosmetic products for sun protection, namely, sunscreen preparations, cosmetic preparations for bronzing and tanning of the skin; depilatory products, namely, depilatories; hair lotions and hairsprays; shampoo; aftershave lotions; nail varnish; cosmetic bath preparations; eye shadow; blusher; foundation; make-up and make-up removing products, namely, make-up remover; false eyelashes, cosmetic sets comprising eye shadow, blusher, foundation, concealer, powder, mascara, eye liner, lipstick, lip gloss, lip balm, lip liner, bronzerSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 5, 2022DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Mar 5, 2022DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Mar 20, 2020INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Feb 20, 2020INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Feb 20, 2020INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Jan 24, 2020INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Sep 5, 2019NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Aug 15, 2019NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
May 24, 2019C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Nov 1, 2018ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Oct 23, 2017REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED—
Aug 22, 2017TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jul 30, 2015NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Feb 5, 2015NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Sep 20, 2013ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 20, 2013REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jul 14, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 24, 2013FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jun 24, 2013FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Jun 1, 2013NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jan 23, 2013FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Oct 23, 2012R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Sep 9, 2012GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 7, 2012NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Aug 7, 2012PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 18, 2012OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Jul 18, 2012OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jul 18, 2012NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jun 30, 2012PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jun 28, 2012CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 28, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 28, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 19, 2012ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 6, 2012TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 31, 2012ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 31, 2012REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Dec 24, 2011RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 8, 2011RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Dec 8, 2011RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Dec 8, 2011RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Dec 7, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 1, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 11, 2011MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Oct 5, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Sep 30, 2011REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance