Drawing for PORAG-DUR

USPTO serial 79102598

PORAG-DUR

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 4184795Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Aug 7, 2012
Examiner
MORRIS, KRISTINA KLOIBER
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PORAG-DUR?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Joseph W. Berenato, III

Joseph W. Berenato, III Berenato & White, LLC6550 Rock Spring DriveSuite 240Bethesda, MD 20817

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
001Chemical substances for industrial purposes, in particular ceramic compositions for coating of artificial surfaces; chemical substances for industrial purposes, namely ceramic compositions with antimicrobial character, in particular for coating of implantable medical products, such as endoprosthesesSECTION 71 - CANCELLED
010Implantable medical products, namely, surgical implants of artificial materials; antimicrobial implantable medical products, namely, surgical implants of artificial materials; prostheses for knee, hand, leg and finger and surgical implants of artificial materials for medical use, in particular endoprostheses with antimicrobial coatingSECTION 71 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 8, 2021DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED
Nov 8, 2021DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Jan 3, 2020INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB
Dec 3, 2019INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB
Dec 2, 2019INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED
Nov 8, 2019INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED
Mar 8, 2019C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71
Aug 7, 2017REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED
Feb 26, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Feb 4, 2013FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Feb 4, 2013FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED
Dec 2, 2012GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB
Nov 7, 2012FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Aug 7, 2012R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
May 22, 2012NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED
May 22, 2012PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 16, 2012OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
May 16, 2012OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
May 2, 2012NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED
Apr 16, 2012PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Apr 16, 2012ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Mar 26, 2012CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Mar 22, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Mar 22, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Mar 22, 2012TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 5, 2012ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 5, 2012REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Feb 21, 2012TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Jan 30, 2012GAUNNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - E-MAILED
Jan 30, 2012GAUDNOTICE OF UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - E-MAILED
Jan 30, 2012NAUDREPORT UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - COMPLETED
Jan 17, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Jan 17, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jan 17, 2012TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 17, 2012TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Nov 5, 2011RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Oct 19, 2011RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Oct 19, 2011RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Oct 15, 2011RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Oct 14, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 11, 2011MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED
Oct 7, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Oct 7, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Oct 6, 2011REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance