Drawing for GFK MEDIA EFFICIENCY PANEL

USPTO serial 79102654

GFK MEDIA EFFICIENCY PANEL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 4137508Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
May 8, 2012
Examiner
WIENER, MICHAEL
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with GFK MEDIA EFFICIENCY PANEL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Terese R. Cohen and Nels T. Lippert

Terese R. Cohen and Nels T. Lippert Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP399 Park AvenueNew York, NY 10022UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Data processing programsSECTION 71 - CANCELLED
035Drawing up statistics in the field of economic, marketing, market research and market analysis, business consultancy, organization consultancy in business affairs, professional business consultancy, opinion polling in the field of economicsSECTION 71 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 19, 2022DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED
Feb 19, 2022DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Jul 16, 2020ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB
Jan 23, 2020NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Nov 30, 2019INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB
Sep 3, 2019INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB
Sep 3, 2019INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED
Aug 14, 2019INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED
Dec 14, 2018C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71
Oct 6, 2017NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
May 8, 2017REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED
Mar 2, 2017NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Jan 6, 2014CORNCORRECTION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED
Dec 23, 2013CRCVCORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB
Nov 26, 2012GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB
Sep 9, 2012FINVFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Aug 17, 2012FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Aug 17, 2012FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED
Aug 8, 2012FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
May 8, 2012R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Feb 21, 2012NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED
Feb 21, 2012PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 8, 2012OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Feb 8, 2012OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Feb 1, 2012NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED
Jan 18, 2012PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Jan 17, 2012ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Dec 28, 2011CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Dec 20, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Dec 20, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Dec 20, 2011TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 11, 2011RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Dec 8, 2011ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 8, 2011REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Nov 18, 2011RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Nov 18, 2011RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Nov 18, 2011RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Nov 17, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 9, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Oct 15, 2011MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED
Oct 11, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Oct 6, 2011REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance