USPTO serial 79102818
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Hampshire, GB
Hampshire SO53 3ZL, GB
Hampshire SO53 3ZL, GB
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mainak H. Mehta
Mainak H. Mehta PROCOPIO, CORY, HARGREAVES & SAVITCH LLP525 B. Street, Suite 2200San Diego, CA 92101UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Suction pumps, valves for suction pumps, and replacement parts for suction pumps | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 29, 2022 | PR75 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 71 & 15 | — |
| Aug 2, 2022 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 4, 2022 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 6, 2021 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 23, 2021 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Sep 19, 2018 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 19, 2018 | C75A | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Sep 18, 2018 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 6, 2018 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 6, 2017 | REM3 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 21, 2014 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 2, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 16, 2013 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 16, 2013 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Feb 6, 2013 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 6, 2012 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 22, 2012 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 21, 2012 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 21, 2012 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 1, 2012 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 1, 2012 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 1, 2012 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 17, 2012 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 10, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 9, 2012 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 7, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 7, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 6, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 27, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 19, 2012 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 29, 2011 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 29, 2011 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Dec 28, 2011 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Dec 27, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 26, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 14, 2011 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Oct 10, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 6, 2011 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |