USPTO serial 79102839
GRIFLAM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4277687Status 706Registered
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jan 22, 2013
- Examiner
- BESCH, JAY C
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
Need help with GRIFLAM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
64823 Groß-Umstadt, DE
64823 Groß-Umstadt, DE
Groß-Umstadt, DE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Nathaniel Kramer
Nathaniel Kramer Kirschstein, Israel, Schiffmiller & Pieroni, P.C.425 5th Avenue5th Floor, Suite 501NEW YORK, NY 10016-2223Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 011 | [ Installations consisting of gas regulating apparatus, namely, gas regulators, pressure regulators for gas cylinders and for gas installations, regulating accessories for gas pipes and lines and gas supply panels; ] semi-automatic and completely automatic heating installations; burners and parts thereof designed for the aforesaid installations and other installations, namely, gas burners, gas burners for industrial use, handles for gas burners, shafts for gas burners | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Messer Cutting Systems GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by Messer Cutting Systems GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by Messer Cutting Systems GmbH
- Other trademarks in Class 011
- Similar marks named GRIFLAM
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 10, 2025 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| May 3, 2024 | INNA | INVALIDATION REVIEWED - NO ACTION REQUIRED BY OFFICE | — |
| Apr 25, 2024 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Aug 25, 2023 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 25, 2023 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Aug 10, 2023 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 22, 2023 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 22, 2022 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| May 8, 2020 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Feb 12, 2020 | INPS | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 12, 2020 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Jan 21, 2020 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Jun 6, 2019 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| May 21, 2019 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| May 21, 2019 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| May 16, 2019 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| May 14, 2019 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 22, 2018 | REM3 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 30, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 11, 2013 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 11, 2013 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Apr 22, 2013 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 22, 2013 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Dec 14, 2012 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 6, 2012 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 6, 2012 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 17, 2012 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 17, 2012 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 17, 2012 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 29, 2012 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 27, 2012 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 26, 2012 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 26, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 17, 2012 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 13, 2012 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 13, 2012 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 13, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 17, 2012 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 17, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 27, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 20, 2012 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 26, 2012 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Nov 5, 2011 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 18, 2011 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 18, 2011 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Oct 15, 2011 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Oct 14, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 14, 2011 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Oct 10, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 10, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 7, 2011 | LIMI | LIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Oct 7, 2011 | SDRC | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB | — |