Drawing for BAMBERGER KAISERDOM IMPORTED FROM GERMANY

USPTO serial 79102956

BAMBERGER KAISERDOM IMPORTED FROM GERMANY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
BHANOT, KAPIL KUMAR
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 108 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BAMBERGER KAISERDOM IMPORTED FROM GERMANY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Neil F. Greenblum

Neil F. Greenblum Greenblum & Bernstein, PLC1950 Roland Clark PlaceReston, VA 20191UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
032Beer, low-alcohol beer and non-alcoholic beer, beer-based mix drinks, malt beer, ginger beer, pale beerSECTION 70 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 27, 2022DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED
Feb 26, 2022DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Jul 2, 2020NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Jan 10, 2019NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Mar 16, 2017NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Jul 23, 2015NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Feb 11, 2014FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Jan 22, 2014FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Jan 22, 2014FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Mar 30, 2013OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB
Mar 13, 2013OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Mar 13, 2013OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Jan 22, 2013MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 22, 2013ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jun 26, 2012GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED
Jun 26, 2012GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 26, 2012CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 11, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Jun 11, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jun 11, 2012TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 31, 2011RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Dec 9, 2011RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Dec 9, 2011RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Dec 8, 2011RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Dec 7, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 5, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Oct 18, 2011MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED
Oct 14, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Oct 13, 2011REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance