Drawing for TRUSTFIRE

USPTO serial 79103029

TRUSTFIRE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
CORWIN, KEVIN SCOTT
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 112 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with TRUSTFIRE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Battery plate; lighting battery; battery; battery charger; battery; batteries for pocket lamps; primary battery; solar batterySECTION 70 - CANCELLED
011Bicycle lights; flashlight; pocket flashlight; cycle lights; torches for lighting; flash lampSECTION 70 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 30, 2022DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED
Mar 29, 2022DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Dec 28, 2020NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Dec 2, 2019ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB
Mar 20, 2015OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB
Aug 11, 2013FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Jul 19, 2013FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Jul 19, 2013FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Mar 30, 2013OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB
Mar 13, 2013OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Mar 13, 2013OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Jul 19, 2012MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 19, 2012ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 9, 2012RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Dec 22, 2011RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Dec 22, 2011RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Dec 22, 2011RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Dec 21, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 21, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Oct 18, 2011MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED
Oct 14, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Oct 13, 2011REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance