USPTO serial 79103040
EZENT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MORRIS, KRISTINA KLOIBER
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with EZENT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
03044 Cottbus, DE
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Scientific, navigation, surveying, photographic, film, optical, weighing, measuring signaling, control, life-saving and teaching apparatus and instruments, namely, microscopes, compasses, protractors, cameras, magnifying glasses, telescopes, graduated rulers, emergency flares, optical lenses, scales, signaling buoys, lifesaving rafts; apparatus and instruments for conducting, switching, transforming, accumulating, regulating or controlling electricity; electrical sensors for the determination of physical and chemical properties; detectors, in particular gas detectors; integrated circuit chips; data processing equipment and computers; computer software for use by electric sensors; detectors, namely, gas detectors for detecting the presence of gas; stored computer operating programs | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 040 | Air deodorising; air purification; air freshening | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | Scientific and technological services and research and design relating thereto, namely, scientific research, computer consultation; industrial analysis and research services in the field of sensor technology; design and development of computer hardware and software; computer hardware and software consulting and technological planning related thereto | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 23, 2021 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Nov 22, 2021 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Dec 1, 2013 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 13, 2013 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 13, 2013 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 30, 2013 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 13, 2013 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 13, 2013 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 13, 2012 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 13, 2012 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 17, 2012 | NAUD | NOTICE OF UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - MAILED | — |
| Apr 16, 2012 | NAUD | REPORT UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 29, 2012 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 29, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 26, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 14, 2012 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 12, 2011 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 24, 2011 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 24, 2011 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Oct 22, 2011 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Oct 21, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 18, 2011 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Oct 14, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 14, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 13, 2011 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |