USPTO serial 79103158
SECOLINO ABSORPTION TECHNOLOGY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4247890Status 706Registered
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Nov 27, 2012
- Examiner
- PEREZ, STEVEN M
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
Need help with SECOLINO ABSORPTION TECHNOLOGY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
E-03291 Elche, ES
E-03291 Elche, ES
E-03291 Elche, ES
E-03291 Elche, ES
E-03291 Elche, ES
E-03291 Elche, ES
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Felipe Rubio
Felipe Rubio Rubio & Associates8950 SW 74th Ct, Suite 1804Miami, FL 33156UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | [ Surgical instruments and apparatus; artificial limbs, eyes and teeth; ] orthopedic articles, namely, orthopedic soles, orthopedic insoles, orthopedic footwear, orthopedic supports, structural fitted parts for orthopedic footwear in the nature of moisture wicking coverings and coatings sold as a component part of orthopedic footwear | ACTIVE | — |
| 025 | Clothing, namely, T-Shirts [, shirts, pants, tops, bottoms, trousers, slacks, shorts, blouses, coats, jackets, belts, beachwear, dresses, underwear, socks, neckwear, nightwear ; ] and footwear [ ; headwear ] | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Abraham Garcia Ruiz
- Other trademarks owned by Abraham Garcia Ruiz
- Other trademarks owned by Abraham Garcia Ruiz
- Other trademarks owned by Jorge Garcia Ruiz
- Other trademarks owned by Jorge Garcia Ruiz
- Other trademarks owned by Jorge Garcia Ruiz
- Other trademarks in Class 010
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Similar marks named SECOLINO ABSORPTION TECHNOLOGY
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 5, 2023 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| May 9, 2023 | XXSS | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB | — |
| May 9, 2023 | XXCR | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED | — |
| Mar 25, 2023 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Jul 25, 2022 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 25, 2022 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Jul 19, 2022 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 9, 2022 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 27, 2021 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 5, 2021 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Jul 18, 2019 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Apr 29, 2019 | XXSS | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 29, 2019 | XXCR | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED | — |
| Apr 6, 2019 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Aug 6, 2018 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 6, 2018 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Aug 6, 2018 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 17, 2018 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 16, 2015 | INNA | INVALIDATION REVIEWED - NO ACTION REQUIRED BY OFFICE | — |
| Mar 28, 2015 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Jul 28, 2014 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Jul 28, 2014 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 28, 2014 | LIME | LIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED AND ENTERED | — |
| Jul 4, 2014 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Oct 7, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 12, 2013 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 12, 2013 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Feb 27, 2013 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 27, 2012 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 7, 2012 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 11, 2012 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 22, 2012 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 22, 2012 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 22, 2012 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 3, 2012 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 31, 2012 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 25, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 25, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 25, 2012 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 11, 2012 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 10, 2012 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 24, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 24, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 11, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 30, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 5, 2011 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 17, 2011 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 17, 2011 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Nov 17, 2011 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Nov 16, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 8, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 21, 2011 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Oct 17, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 14, 2011 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |