USPTO serial 79103197
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Brian A. Coleman
Brian A. Coleman Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP1500 K Street NWSuite 1100Washington, DC 20005| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 018 | Bags, namely, all purpose carrying bags, baby carrying bags, and bags for carrying babies' accessories; trunks and traveling bags; carriers for babies and children worn on the body; slings for carrying babies and children; back frames for carrying babies and children; sling bags for carrying babies and children; baby changing bags in the nature of bags for carrying babies' accessories; nappy bags in the nature of diaper bags; baby care bags in the nature of bags for carrying babies' accessories sold empty; travel bags; backpacks; suitcases; reusable shopping bags; reusable shopping bags in frames on wheels; umbrellas; parasols; structural parts and fittings for all the aforementioned goods | ABANDONED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 30, 2022 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 29, 2022 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Mar 8, 2018 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Mar 24, 2017 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 8, 2017 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 8, 2017 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 8, 2016 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Mar 8, 2016 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Mar 8, 2016 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 8, 2016 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 1, 2015 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 1, 2015 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 2, 2012 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 28, 2012 | RFNP | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 7, 2012 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 6, 2012 | OPNS | OPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 6, 2012 | OPNC | OPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) CREATED | — |
| Apr 27, 2012 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 10, 2012 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 10, 2012 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 4, 2012 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 4, 2012 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 21, 2012 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 5, 2012 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 1, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 14, 2012 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 3, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 2, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 2, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 19, 2012 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 29, 2011 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 29, 2011 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Dec 28, 2011 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Dec 27, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 22, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 21, 2011 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Oct 17, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 14, 2011 | SDRC | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB | — |