Drawing for Serial No. 79103372

USPTO serial 79103372

Serial No. 79103372

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 4247892Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Nov 27, 2012
Examiner
CASE, LEIGH CAROLINE
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with Serial No. 79103372?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003Perfumery; cosmetic creams; skin whitening creams; hair lotions; lotions for cosmetic purposes; beauty masks; oils for cosmetic purposes; essential oils; cleansing milk for toilet purposes; soap; cosmetic kits comprising one or more of cosmetic creams, beauty masks, perfumery, lipsticks, shampoos, cosmetic preparations for bath and make-up removing preparations; lipsticks; pomades for cosmetic purposes; cosmetic preparations for baths; cosmetic preparations for slimming purposes; make-up removing preparations; tissues impregnated with cosmetic lotions; cosmetic preparations for skin care; cosmetics; shampoosSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 26, 2022DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Mar 26, 2022DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Jun 19, 2020INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
May 19, 2020INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
May 19, 2020INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Feb 28, 2020INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Jun 28, 2019C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Nov 27, 2017REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED—
Aug 4, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 12, 2013FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jul 12, 2013FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Feb 27, 2013FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Nov 27, 2012R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Oct 7, 2012GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 11, 2012NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Sep 11, 2012PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 22, 2012OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Aug 22, 2012OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Aug 22, 2012NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Aug 20, 2012TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Aug 6, 2012PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Aug 3, 2012ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 19, 2012CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 6, 2012NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - MAILED—
Jul 6, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 6, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 6, 2012TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 6, 2012PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Jul 6, 2012PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
May 25, 2012MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 25, 2012ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 20, 2011RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 28, 2011RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Oct 28, 2011RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Oct 28, 2011RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Oct 27, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 25, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 25, 2011MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Oct 21, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Oct 20, 2011REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance