Drawing for GENTIX

USPTO serial 79103379

GENTIX

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SHARMA, NAPOLEON
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 107 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with GENTIX?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer input devices, computer mice, computer keyboardsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 12, 2024ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Dec 28, 2023NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Mar 27, 2022DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Mar 26, 2022DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Apr 5, 2018NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Dec 16, 2016NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Oct 27, 2016CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Feb 24, 2014CORNCORRECTION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED—
Feb 17, 2014CRCVCORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB—
Sep 6, 2013FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 21, 2013FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Aug 21, 2013FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Apr 6, 2013OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 20, 2013OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Mar 20, 2013OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Aug 21, 2012MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Aug 21, 2012ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 25, 2012RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 28, 2011RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Dec 28, 2011RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Dec 24, 2011RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Dec 23, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 23, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 25, 2011MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Oct 21, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Oct 20, 2011REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance