USPTO serial 79103458
SEALSKINZ
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4389960Status 707Registered
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 27, 2013
- Examiner
- BIDDULPH, HEATHER ANN
- Law office
- —
What this means
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
Need help with SEALSKINZ?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Pamela N. Hirschman
Pamela N. Hirschman Davis Graham & Stubbs LLP3400 Walnut Street, Suite 700Denver, CO 80205United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | [ Protective clothing made of synthetic materials, wool or cotton, namely, cut-resistant gloves, [ flame retardant gloves, and flame retardant socks, ] excluding clothing made primarily of faux fur, hides and fur [ ; waterproof safety clothing made of synthetic materials, wool or cotton, namely, waterproof cut-resistant gloves, waterproof flame retardant gloves, and waterproof flame retardant socks, excluding waterproof clothing made primarily of faux fur, hides and fur ]] | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 024 | [ Textiles, namely, textile fabrics made of synthetic materials, wool or cotton for use in the manufacture of garments, bags, jackets, gloves, socks and apparel, excluding textile fabrics made primarily of faux fur, hides and fur; bed covers; textile fabrics incorporating plastics films or foils; textile laminates, namely, laminated textiles for use in the manufacture of garments, bags, jackets, socks, gloves, and apparel; waterproof fabrics made of synthetic materials, wool or cotton for textile use and for the manufacture of clothing, excluding waterproof fabrics made primarily of faux fur, hides and fur; waterproof fabrics made of synthetic materials, wool or cotton for use in the manufacture of clothing, footwear, headgear, gloves, socks, underclothing and outer-clothing, excluding waterproof fabrics made primarily of faux fur, hides and fur ] | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 025 | Clothing made of synthetic materials, wool or cotton, namely, [ pants, jackets, ] socks, gloves, and mittens, footwear, headgear, namely, headwear, headgear and other articles of outer clothing, namely, headwear, [ coats, ] excluding clothing made primarily of faux fur, hides and fur; waterproof clothing made of synthetic materials, wool or cotton, namely, [ coats, ] socks, mittens and gloves, waterproof footwear, excluding waterproof clothing made primarily of faux fur, hides and fur; headgear made of synthetic materials, wool or cotton, namely, caps, rain hats, beanie hats and skull caps, excluding headgear made primarily of faux fur, hides and fur [ ; underclothing and outer-clothing made of synthetic materials, wool or cotton, namely, pants, shirts, excluding underclothing and outer-clothing made primarily of faux fur, hides and fur ] | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Sealskinz Limited
- Other trademarks owned by Sealskinz Limited
- Other trademarks owned by Sealskinz Limited
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 024
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Similar marks named SEALSKINZ
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 17, 2024 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 17, 2024 | ECDR | TEAS CHANGE OF DOMESTIC REPRESENTATIVES ADDRESS | — |
| Nov 17, 2024 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 17, 2024 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 25, 2023 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Jun 22, 2023 | INPS | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 22, 2023 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| May 20, 2023 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Sep 20, 2022 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 20, 2022 | 71.P | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC 71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Sep 9, 2022 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 27, 2022 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 14, 2021 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Nov 1, 2020 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Sep 24, 2020 | INPS | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 23, 2020 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Sep 23, 2020 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Jan 23, 2020 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 23, 2020 | C75P | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jan 22, 2020 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 25, 2019 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 27, 2018 | REM3 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 30, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 6, 2013 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 6, 2013 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Nov 27, 2013 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 27, 2013 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 17, 2013 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 11, 2013 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 11, 2013 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 22, 2013 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| May 22, 2013 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 22, 2013 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| May 3, 2013 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 3, 2013 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 3, 2013 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| May 3, 2013 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 3, 2013 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 3, 2013 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 6, 2013 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 20, 2013 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 20, 2013 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 1, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 1, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 1, 2013 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 28, 2013 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 28, 2013 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Feb 28, 2013 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Feb 28, 2013 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Aug 31, 2012 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Aug 31, 2012 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 31, 2012 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 6, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 6, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 6, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 27, 2012 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 6, 2012 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 4, 2012 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Dec 31, 2011 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Dec 30, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 20, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 28, 2011 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Oct 24, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 21, 2011 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |