USPTO serial 79103656
CHACHA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4336657Status 706Registered
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 21, 2013
- Examiner
- DAWE III, WILLIAM H
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
Need help with CHACHA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Prakash NAMA
121 Moore StPrinceton, NJ 08540UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | [ Charqui, namely, dried meat; food products made from fish, namely, processed fish; fruits, tinned; fruit chips; ] fruit-based snack food; potato chips; potato crisps; ] [ peanut butter; jams; compote, namely, cranberry sauce, tahini, namely, sesame seed paste; vegetables, dried; pickles; preserved vegetables, namely, salted vegetables; flavored radish; dried bamboo shoots; eggs; soybean milk; cheese; yoghurt; milk based beverages, namely, milk base[ d beverages containing fruit juice, milk based beverages with chocolate, milk based beverages containing coffee; milk products excluding ice cream, ice milk and frozen yogurt; milk based beverage containing tea; chocolate nut butter; cocoa butter for food purposes; vegetable salads; fruit salads; ] fruit jellies; prepared nuts; [ processed peanuts; ] processed sunflower seeds [; processed edible melon seeds; ] [ processed pine nuts; processed pistachios; processed beans, namely, flavored beans; canned cooked beans; processed mushrooms, namely, dried edible mushroom; albumen for use in food; processed peanuts with honey ] | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 1, 2024 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Sep 4, 2024 | INPS | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 4, 2024 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Aug 23, 2024 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Dec 22, 2023 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 22, 2023 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Dec 22, 2023 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| May 3, 2023 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 24, 2022 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 12, 2022 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 21, 2022 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| May 6, 2022 | XXSS | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB | — |
| May 6, 2022 | XXCR | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED | — |
| Sep 9, 2021 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Sep 4, 2021 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 4, 2021 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 23, 2021 | CREV | CORRECTION FROM IB ENTERED - ATTORNEY REVIEW REQUIRED | — |
| Jun 13, 2021 | CRCV | CORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| May 30, 2021 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 16, 2021 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 19, 2021 | INNA | INVALIDATION REVIEWED - NO ACTION REQUIRED BY OFFICE | — |
| Nov 9, 2020 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 9, 2020 | C75A | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Nov 9, 2020 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 9, 2020 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Nov 6, 2020 | PCGR | PETITION TO DIRECTOR GRANTED | — |
| Oct 30, 2020 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Aug 24, 2020 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Jun 22, 2020 | TPDR | TEAS PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 25, 2019 | NC71 | NOTICE OF CANCELLATION SEC. 71 E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 24, 2019 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Sep 16, 2019 | INNA | INVALIDATION REVIEWED - NO ACTION REQUIRED BY OFFICE | — |
| Sep 9, 2019 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Jan 9, 2019 | PR75 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 71 & 15 | — |
| Jan 3, 2019 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 6, 2018 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 16, 2018 | PR75 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 71 & 15 | — |
| Jun 12, 2018 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 5, 2018 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 5, 2018 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 21, 2018 | REM3 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 5, 2018 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 19, 2016 | TMBN | TTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS | — |
| May 19, 2016 | CANT | CANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 19, 2016 | CAND | CANCELLATION DENIED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 15, 2015 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 27, 2013 | PETC | CANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 15, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 23, 2013 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 22, 2013 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Aug 21, 2013 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 21, 2013 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Apr 8, 2013 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 5, 2013 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 5, 2013 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 13, 2013 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 13, 2013 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 13, 2013 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 28, 2013 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 28, 2013 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 16, 2013 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 4, 2013 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 4, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 3, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 3, 2013 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 3, 2013 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jan 3, 2013 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 26, 2012 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 26, 2012 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 29, 2012 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 29, 2012 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 29, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 7, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 6, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 6, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 27, 2011 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 10, 2011 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 8, 2011 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Nov 8, 2011 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Nov 7, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 4, 2011 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Oct 31, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 31, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 28, 2011 | LIMI | LIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Oct 27, 2011 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |