Drawing for TRIFIX

USPTO serial 79103749

TRIFIX

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 4336658Status 706Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
May 21, 2013
Examiner
GLASSER, CARYN
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.

Need help with TRIFIX?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jeffrey H. Handelsman

Jeffrey H. Handelsman Greenblum & Bernstein, P.L.C.1950 Roland Clarke PlaceReston, VA 20191-1411UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Machine tools for forming, shaping or machining metal and plastic or other rigid materials by cutting, boring, grinding, sharpening or finishing, milling machines, drilling machines [, copying machines, namely, machine tools for machining metal, which copies the form of a sample item to a workpiece ] ; and turning machines in the nature of power operated metalworking machine tools, namely, turning tools; tool turrets and tool disc turrets used to allow equipment to carry multiple cutting tools at one time and mount individual tools in the correct sequence; [ structural parts for the aforesaid machines and turrets, namely, hydraulic and electromechanical constant and variable speed drives, for machines and positioning devices for positioning a workpiece in the nature of vices, clamps and jaws for use in the precision clamping of work pieces; rotary indexing tables; tool stores, namely, tool magazines; ] tool holders, tool [ and workpiece ] positioning devices [, and workpiece holders in the nature of clamps for use in the precision clamping of workpieces, power tool, namely, an interchangeable chuck used for cutting, boring, grinding, sharpening or finishing tools; power tools, namely, drill presses, grinders, power drills, jigsaws, circular saws, assembly tools for screws and nuts, namely, electric screwdrivers and bits for power drills ]ACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 26, 2024INNPPARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB
Jul 24, 2024XXSSGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB
Jul 24, 2024XXCRGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED
Jun 18, 2024INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED
Dec 22, 2023ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB
Oct 15, 2023NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED
Oct 15, 202371AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED
Oct 15, 2023APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL
May 5, 2023ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB
Mar 22, 2023ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED
May 21, 2022REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED
Feb 11, 2022CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB
Aug 27, 2021RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED
Mar 19, 2019NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED
Mar 19, 2019C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.
Mar 19, 2019APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL
Mar 8, 2019ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED
May 21, 2018REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED
Jan 11, 2014FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Dec 24, 2013FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Dec 23, 2013FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED
Aug 21, 2013FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
May 21, 2013R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Apr 8, 2013GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB
Mar 5, 2013NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED
Mar 5, 2013PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 13, 2013OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Feb 13, 2013OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Feb 13, 2013NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED
Jan 25, 2013PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Jan 22, 2013CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Jan 22, 2013XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED
Jan 22, 2013GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
Jan 22, 2013GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
Jan 22, 2013CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN
Jul 19, 2012GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED
Jul 19, 2012GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 19, 2012CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 22, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Jun 22, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jun 15, 2012ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Jun 5, 2012ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 5, 2012REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Jun 5, 2012TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 24, 2011RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Dec 5, 2011RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Dec 5, 2011RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Dec 5, 2011RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Dec 4, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 1, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Nov 1, 2011MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED
Oct 28, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Oct 27, 2011REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance