Drawing for JET SET

USPTO serial 79103787

JET SET

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BRADLEY, EVELYN
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 105 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with JET SET?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Laurel V. Dineff

TAMARA A HEAD DINEFF TRADEMARK LAW LIMITED160 NORTH WACKER DRIVECHICAGO, IL 60606UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
014WatchesSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 26, 2017DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Aug 25, 2017DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Jun 6, 2014FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
May 16, 2014FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
May 16, 2014FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
May 16, 2013MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Apr 30, 2013ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Apr 30, 2013EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Apr 13, 2013OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 27, 2013OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Mar 27, 2013OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Feb 26, 2013GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Feb 26, 2013GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Feb 26, 2013CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Feb 23, 2013CNCFACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED—
Feb 10, 2013NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jan 31, 2013TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 31, 2013CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 29, 2013ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 28, 2013ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Jan 28, 2013EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jan 28, 2013JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jan 28, 2013EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Jul 28, 2012GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Jul 28, 2012GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 28, 2012CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 27, 2012ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Jul 6, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 6, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 6, 2012TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 6, 2012ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 6, 2012REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jan 27, 2012RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 6, 2012RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jan 5, 2012RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jan 1, 2012RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Dec 31, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 22, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 8, 2011MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Nov 2, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Oct 27, 2011SDRCSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance