Drawing for PUCK

USPTO serial 79103947

PUCK

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 4231918Status 709
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Oct 30, 2012
Examiner
LOBO, DEBORAH E
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PUCK?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Stacey Halpern

Stacey Halpern Knobbe, Martens, Olson & Bear, LLP2040 Main Street, 14th FloorIrvine, CA 92614UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029[ Milk and ] milk products, namely, cheese [ and yoghurt ]; [ milk and ] cream [ in powder form, milk based dessert mousses; edible oils and fats ]SECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 7, 2025NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Feb 18, 2024INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Jan 25, 2024INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Jan 25, 2024INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Jan 12, 2024INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
May 12, 2023C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Oct 30, 2021REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Sep 23, 2021RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Feb 14, 2018NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Feb 14, 2018C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Feb 14, 2018APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Feb 2, 2018ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
Oct 30, 2017REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED—
Nov 7, 2014NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Feb 26, 2013FINVFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 4, 2013FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Feb 4, 2013FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Jan 30, 2013FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Oct 30, 2012R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Sep 15, 2012GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 14, 2012NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Aug 14, 2012PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 25, 2012OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Jul 25, 2012OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jul 25, 2012NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jul 9, 2012PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jul 9, 2012CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 5, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 5, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 5, 2012ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 21, 2012TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 20, 2012ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 20, 2012REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
May 17, 2012LIMNLIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED—
Apr 22, 2012LIMGLIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB—
Feb 25, 2012RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 28, 2011RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Dec 28, 2011RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Dec 24, 2011RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Dec 23, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 21, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 11, 2011MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Nov 7, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Nov 4, 2011LIMILIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED—
Nov 3, 2011REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance