Drawing for PAUL MARTIN

USPTO serial 79104123

PAUL MARTIN

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SETTLES LEWIS, SHAILA E
Law office
MADRID PROCESSING UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PAUL MARTIN?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
025Clothing, footwear, headgearSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 30, 2022DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Jan 29, 2022DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Nov 20, 2020NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Apr 23, 2020NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Feb 21, 2015CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Sep 20, 2013NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jul 20, 2013FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 1, 2013FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jun 29, 2013FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Feb 13, 2013LIMNLIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED—
Jan 28, 2013CORNCORRECTION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED—
Jan 25, 2013CRCVCORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB—
Jan 25, 2013LIMGLIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB—
Dec 6, 2012LIMNLIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED—
Nov 17, 2012LIMGLIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB—
Jul 2, 2012MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jun 29, 2012ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Dec 5, 2011RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 19, 2011MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Nov 17, 2011RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Nov 17, 2011RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Nov 17, 2011RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Nov 16, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 15, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 15, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Nov 10, 2011REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance