Drawing for CHOOSTENT

USPTO serial 79104205

CHOOSTENT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
DAHLING, KRISTIN M
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 113 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CHOOSTENT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
010Medical stents; medical guidewires; endoprostheses for medical purposes; probes for medical purposes; physiotherapy apparatus; bone cementation tools and equipment; urethral syringes; artificial pneumothorax; pharmaceutical apparatus and instruments; prosthetic instruments for dental purposes; surgical implants (artificial materials); electrodes for medical useSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 18, 2020DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Apr 17, 2020DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
May 23, 2019NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jul 6, 2013FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 20, 2013FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jun 20, 2013FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Apr 29, 2013OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 10, 2013OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Apr 10, 2013OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jun 20, 2012MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jun 20, 2012ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Dec 12, 2011RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 23, 2011RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Nov 23, 2011RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Nov 22, 2011RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Nov 21, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 18, 2011MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Nov 14, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 14, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Nov 10, 2011REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance