Drawing for PARADISO

USPTO serial 79104289

PARADISO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
RINKER, ANTHONY MICHAEL
Law office
MADRID PROCESSING UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PARADISO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
030Pasta, including noodles; sauces (except salad dressings), including noodle sauces and pestoSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 3, 2022DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Apr 2, 2022DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Feb 26, 2021NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jun 21, 2019NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Sep 11, 2015NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jan 3, 2015NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Aug 17, 2013FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 1, 2013FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Aug 1, 2013FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Apr 29, 2013OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 10, 2013OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Apr 10, 2013OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Oct 4, 2012LIMNLIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED—
Aug 31, 2012LIMGLIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB—
Aug 1, 2012MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Aug 1, 2012ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 27, 2012RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 6, 2012RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jan 3, 2012RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Dec 29, 2011RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Dec 28, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 26, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 18, 2011MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Nov 14, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Nov 10, 2011REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance