Drawing for HANGOVER BG KILLER

USPTO serial 79104346

HANGOVER BG KILLER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 4159731Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jun 19, 2012
Examiner
MONINGHOFF, KIM TERESA
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with HANGOVER BG KILLER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Joan Optican Herman

Joan Optican Herman HOVEY WILLIAMS LLP10801 MASTIN ST STE 1000OVERLAND PARK, KS 66210-1697UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
032Non alcoholic beverages, namely, carbonated beverages, non-carbonated soft drinks, energy drinks, flavored waters, fruit drinks, fruit-flavored drinks, isotonic drinks, sport drinks, soft drinks, flavored soft drinks; syrups, concentrates and powders used in the preparation of soft drinksSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 28, 2021DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Nov 28, 2021DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Jun 19, 2021REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Feb 8, 2019NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jul 23, 2018NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Jul 23, 201871AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Jun 25, 2018APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Jun 4, 2018ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Sep 8, 2017NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Mar 19, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 25, 2012FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Sep 25, 2012FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Sep 19, 2012FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jun 19, 2012R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Apr 3, 2012PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 14, 2012NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Feb 28, 2012PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Feb 28, 2012CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Feb 27, 2012CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 27, 2012XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Feb 27, 2012CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Feb 27, 2012ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Feb 21, 2012PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY—
Feb 6, 2012PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Feb 6, 2012ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 6, 2012ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 23, 2012CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 23, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 23, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 23, 2012TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 5, 2012ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 5, 2012REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Dec 5, 2011RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 19, 2011MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Nov 17, 2011RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Nov 17, 2011RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Nov 17, 2011RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Nov 16, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 15, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 15, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Nov 14, 2011LIMILIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED—
Nov 10, 2011REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance