Drawing for XIR

USPTO serial 79104460

XIR

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 4654652Status 709
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Dec 16, 2014
Examiner
DEFORD, JEFFREY S
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with XIR?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Curtis Krechevsky

Curtis Krechevsky Cantor Colburn LLP20 Church StreetFloor 22Hartford, CT 06103

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
011Lighting apparatus, namely, low-voltage electric lamps with multi-pin bases, intended for operation at an operating voltage less than 50 voltsSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 6, 2026C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Oct 10, 2025NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
May 2, 2025NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Mar 21, 2025ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
May 19, 2024NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Dec 16, 2023REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Oct 8, 2021RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Feb 24, 2020NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Feb 24, 202071AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Feb 5, 2020APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Dec 16, 2019ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Dec 16, 2019REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED—
Nov 11, 2019ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 11, 2019REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
May 22, 2015FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
May 6, 2015FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
May 6, 2015FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Mar 16, 2015FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Dec 16, 2014R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Oct 3, 2014GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 30, 2014NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Sep 30, 2014PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 10, 2014OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Sep 10, 2014OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Sep 10, 2014NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Aug 26, 2014PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Aug 21, 2014EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Aug 19, 2014CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 6, 2014CORNCORRECTION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED—
Aug 4, 2014TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 4, 2014CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 31, 2014CRCVCORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB—
Jul 28, 2014ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Jul 28, 2014EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jul 28, 2014JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jul 28, 2014EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Feb 21, 2014ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Jan 27, 2014GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Jan 27, 2014GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 27, 2014CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 9, 2014TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jan 9, 2014TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 9, 2014CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 9, 2014TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 5, 2014TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jul 9, 2013CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 8, 2013CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 22, 2013RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
May 4, 2013OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 17, 2013OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Apr 17, 2013OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Nov 19, 2012RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
May 18, 2012CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
May 17, 2012CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
May 17, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 17, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 7, 2012ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 27, 2012TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 31, 2011ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 31, 2011REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Dec 31, 2011RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 12, 2011RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Dec 12, 2011RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Dec 9, 2011RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Dec 8, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 8, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 22, 2011MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Nov 18, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Nov 17, 2011REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance