Drawing for TUMBLEFRESH

USPTO serial 79104622

TUMBLEFRESH

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
STRUCK, ROBERT J
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 109 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with TUMBLEFRESH?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Bradley M. Ganz

Bradley M. Ganz Ganz Law, P.C.PO Box 2200Hillsboro, OR 97123UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
031Animal bedding made from fibers of dried wood pulp by-productsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 9, 2022DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
May 8, 2022DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Dec 9, 2013FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 18, 2013FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Nov 15, 2013FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
May 4, 2013OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 17, 2013OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Apr 17, 2013OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Nov 15, 2012MAB0ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE—
Nov 15, 2012ABN0ABANDONMENT - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE—
Oct 25, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 25, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 25, 2012ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
May 11, 2012GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
May 11, 2012GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 11, 2012CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 19, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 19, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 11, 2012ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 29, 2012TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 6, 2012RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 10, 2012RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Feb 9, 2012RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Feb 9, 2012RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Feb 8, 2012CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 31, 2012DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 26, 2011MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Nov 22, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Nov 17, 2011REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance