Drawing for GRAIN DE BLE

USPTO serial 79104709

GRAIN DE BLE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
TANNER, MICHAEL R
Law office
LAW OFFICE 117 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with GRAIN DE BLE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
025Clothing namely, sweaters, trousers, jackets, dresses, cardigans, coats, scarves, anoraks, shorts, T-shirts, underwear, shirts, tights, socks, bathing suits, headgear namely sun hats, caps; footwear excluding orthopaedic footwearSECTION 70 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 29, 2020DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED
Aug 28, 2020DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Apr 6, 2017ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB
Mar 30, 2017NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Jul 14, 2013FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Jun 25, 2013FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Jun 25, 2013FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
May 4, 2013OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB
Apr 17, 2013OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Apr 17, 2013OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Jun 25, 2012MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jun 25, 2012ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Dec 18, 2011RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Nov 28, 2011RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Nov 28, 2011RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Nov 26, 2011MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED
Nov 24, 2011RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Nov 23, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 22, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Nov 22, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Nov 21, 2011LIMILIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED
Nov 18, 2011SDRCSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance