USPTO serial 79104853
IC CONSULT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CRAWFORD, MARY
- Law office
- MADRID PROCESSING UNIT
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with IC CONSULT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Design and development of computer hardware and software; computer software consultancy; technical concept development for software and hardware systems for ensuring security in information and communication technology, namely, research and development of new software and hardware systems for ensuring security in information and communication technology for others; technical consultancy in the field of research and development of new software and hardware systems for ensuring security in information and communication technology for others; Internet services, namely, programming of internet security programs; services for the protection of commercial and private electronic communication processes based on authentication and other cryptographic methods, namely, electronic document and email authentication services and information technology security services for protection against unauthorized network access; administration and distribution of keys, certificates and user data which are needed for user identification, user authentication and device authentication, namely, maintenance of an online database and administration process support for others of keys, certificates, and user data used for user identification, user authentication and device authentication; installation, maintenance and updating of computer software; computer system integration and implementation in the field of data processing | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 20, 2022 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Feb 19, 2022 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Mar 26, 2021 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 7, 2014 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 19, 2013 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 25, 2013 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 24, 2013 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 27, 2012 | LIMN | LIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED | — |
| Aug 17, 2012 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Feb 24, 2012 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| Feb 24, 2012 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Feb 23, 2012 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 14, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 14, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 3, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 24, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 24, 2011 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 2, 2011 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 2, 2011 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Dec 2, 2011 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Dec 1, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 29, 2011 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Nov 28, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 25, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 24, 2011 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |