Drawing for ECOFIX

USPTO serial 79105072

ECOFIX

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
TWOHIG, SHANNON MARIE
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 121

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ECOFIX?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016Carrying bags, of cardboard, of paper; parts for the above goodsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
018Suitcases, of cardboard, of paper; parts for the above goodsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
020Exhibition, assembly and decoration systems for companies and commercial exhibitors (display furniture); parts for the above goods; transport barrelsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
022Carrier bags of fabric, parts for the above goodsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 15, 2022DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Jan 14, 2022DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Jul 27, 2013FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 9, 2013FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jul 9, 2013FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
May 18, 2013OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
May 1, 2013OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
May 1, 2013OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jul 9, 2012MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 9, 2012ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Dec 24, 2011RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 8, 2011MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Dec 7, 2011RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Dec 7, 2011RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Dec 7, 2011RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Dec 6, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 4, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 4, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Dec 1, 2011REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance