USPTO serial 79105200
REHOBOT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4259682Status 706Registered
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Dec 18, 2012
- Examiner
- JUN, WON KYUNG WENDY
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
Need help with REHOBOT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Joel R. Samuels
Joel R. Samuels Harness, Dickey & Pierce, PLC7700 Bonhomme Suite 400Saint Louis, MO 63105UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Machines and machine tools, namely, hydraulic pumps and valves; [ electric motors and engines not for land vehicles; ] machine coupling and transmission components except for land vehicles; [ power jacks; ] hydraulic jacks; [ lifting cranes and other lifting machines in the nature of hoists; lifting tools, namely, elevating or lifting work platforms, lifting installations for the transport of persons and goods; tractor-towed agricultural instruments, namely, pallet fork lifters; ] electric compressors, namely, spring compressors for chassis springs; power operated tools, namely, hydraulic extractors; [ powered stackers cranes; ] hydraulic presses; [ electric pumps; ] valves being parts of machines; [ bending machines; drilling machines; electric motors not for land vehicles; milling machines; sheet metal working machines, namely, pressing, cutting and punching machines; machines for the transport of goods, namely, lifting installations for the transport of persons and goods; machines for cleaning and refuse processing apparatus, namely, industrial trash compacting machines; ] power hand tools, namely, pipe sealing machines, ball joint extractors, and cutting tools for cutting metal; hydraulic [ engines and ] motors; [ shearing machines; ] compressors for machines; [ clutches other than for land vehicles; ] cutting machines; [ grinders; ] machine parts, namely, push and pull cylinders; machine parts, namely, hydraulic cylinders for lifting, pulling, pressing and straightening; hydraulic pumps; compressed air pumps; [ compressed air engines not for land vehicles; ] hydraulic tools, namely, [ hydraulic jacks, ] hydraulic pumps, hydraulic bolt tensioners, hydraulic pullers, hydraulic metal cutters; mechanical spreaders, namely, hydraulic metal spreaders | ACTIVE | — |
| 008 | [ Hand tools, namely, picks, planers, dies, drills, pliers, screw drivers, wrenches, spanners; cutlery; razors; hand-operated lifting-jacks; hand-operated rescue tools, namely, manual clippers, scissors, hand operated spreaders for spreading metal; hand tools, namely, screw clamps; nutcrackers; hand tools, namely, hammers for household purposes; axes for household purposes ] | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 012 | [ Electric and diesel trucks; fork lift trucks and structural parts therefor; high-lift pallet trucks ] | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Rehobot Hydraulics AB
- Other trademarks owned by Rehobot Hydraulics AB
- Other trademarks owned by Rehobot AB
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Other trademarks in Class 008
- Other trademarks in Class 012
- Similar marks named REHOBOT
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 16, 2024 | INNA | INVALIDATION REVIEWED - NO ACTION REQUIRED BY OFFICE | — |
| Jan 5, 2024 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| May 5, 2023 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| May 5, 2023 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| May 5, 2023 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 20, 2022 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 18, 2021 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 8, 2021 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Aug 7, 2020 | INNA | INVALIDATION REVIEWED - NO ACTION REQUIRED BY OFFICE | — |
| Jul 1, 2020 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Jun 19, 2020 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| May 13, 2020 | INPS | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| May 13, 2020 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Sep 8, 2019 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Jan 8, 2019 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 8, 2019 | C75P | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jan 2, 2019 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 1, 2018 | PR75 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 71 & 15 | — |
| Oct 31, 2018 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 17, 2018 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| May 10, 2018 | PR75 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 71 & 15 | — |
| May 8, 2018 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| May 4, 2018 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 8, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 21, 2013 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 21, 2013 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Mar 18, 2013 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 18, 2012 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Nov 30, 2012 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Oct 2, 2012 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 30, 2012 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 12, 2012 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 12, 2012 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 12, 2012 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 30, 2012 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 30, 2012 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 30, 2012 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 29, 2012 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 29, 2012 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 28, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 28, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 28, 2012 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 9, 2012 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 9, 2012 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 14, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 14, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 7, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 29, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 24, 2011 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 8, 2011 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Dec 5, 2011 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 5, 2011 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Dec 5, 2011 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Dec 4, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 4, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 4, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 1, 2011 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |