Drawing for NAUTEX

USPTO serial 79105420

NAUTEX

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FICKES, JERI J
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 107 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with NAUTEX?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
022Textile tents, bags, awningsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
024Woven fabrics, table covers not made of paper, blinds of textile, wall hangings of textile, textile materials and fabrics of plastics as well as coated fabrics for tents, coated fabrics for tubular bags (not made of metal), coated fabrics for interior parts, for pneumatic structures as well as for inflatable boats and for tarpaulinsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 10, 2023RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Nov 8, 2019FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 6, 2018RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 13, 2013DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Aug 10, 2013FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 4, 2013OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 15, 2013FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jul 15, 2013FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
May 1, 2013OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
May 1, 2013OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jul 16, 2012MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 15, 2012ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Dec 30, 2011RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 13, 2011RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Dec 12, 2011RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Dec 10, 2011RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Dec 9, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 8, 2011MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Dec 4, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 4, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Dec 2, 2011SDRCSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance