Drawing for EL PEDREGAL

USPTO serial 79105671

EL PEDREGAL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 4290612Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Feb 19, 2013
Examiner
YAO, GRETTA
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with EL PEDREGAL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Kristin H. Altoff

Kristin H. Altoff Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP1111 Pennsylvania Avenue, NWAttn: TMSUWashington, DC 20004

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
030[ Cocoa; ] chocolate and chocolate products, namely, chocolate barsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 8, 2022DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
May 8, 2022DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Feb 19, 2022REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Mar 21, 2018NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Mar 21, 2018C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Mar 21, 2018APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Mar 5, 2018ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
Feb 19, 2018REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED—
Oct 13, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 25, 2013FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Sep 25, 2013FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
May 19, 2013FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Feb 19, 2013R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jan 7, 2013GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 4, 2012NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Dec 4, 2012PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 14, 2012OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Nov 14, 2012OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Nov 14, 2012NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Oct 30, 2012PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Oct 30, 2012ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 16, 2012CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 9, 2012TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Oct 2, 2012NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - MAILED—
Oct 2, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 2, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 2, 2012TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 2, 2012PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Oct 2, 2012PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Sep 26, 2012MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Sep 26, 2012ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 23, 2012RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 23, 2012RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Feb 23, 2012RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Feb 17, 2012RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Feb 16, 2012CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 14, 2012RFWRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) WITHDRAWN FOR REVIEW—
Feb 12, 2012RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Feb 11, 2012CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 3, 2012DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 13, 2011MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Dec 9, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Dec 8, 2011REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance