USPTO serial 79105783
BARK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PEREZ, STEVEN M
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 101 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BARK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | clothing for men, women and children of textile or material of all kinds, namely, skirts, trousers, shorts, jeans, blouses, jerseys, sweaters, vests, suits, tracksuits, cloaks, coats, overcoats, bomber jackets, tunics, anoraks, raincoats, stockings, socks, hats, scarves, gloves, neckties, swimsuits, belts, shoes, beach shoes, slippers, boots, gymnastic shoes, tennis shoes, bath robes, tights, underwear, sportswear, namely tops and bottoms | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by ICM ITALIA Srl
- Other trademarks owned by BARANZONI Silvia
- Other trademarks owned by SILVIA BARANZONI
- Other trademarks owned by ITALIAN CLOTHING MANAGEMENT S.A.S. DI TODHUNTER JONATHAN ANTHONY & C.
- Other trademarks owned by PAOLO PIEROTTI
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Similar marks named BARK
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 2, 2022 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| May 1, 2022 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| May 3, 2018 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Feb 8, 2018 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Aug 17, 2017 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Jul 20, 2017 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Apr 3, 2014 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 17, 2014 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 15, 2014 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 25, 2013 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 8, 2013 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| May 8, 2013 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 15, 2013 | MAB0 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Mar 15, 2013 | ABN0 | ABANDONMENT - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Mar 1, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 28, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 28, 2013 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 10, 2012 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 10, 2012 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 9, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 9, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 8, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 2, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 17, 2012 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 2, 2012 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 2, 2012 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Feb 1, 2012 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jan 31, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 25, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 16, 2011 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Dec 12, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 9, 2011 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |