Drawing for DALLOYAU PARIS

USPTO serial 79105840

DALLOYAU PARIS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 4281127Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jan 29, 2013
Examiner
WOOD, CAROLINE
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DALLOYAU PARIS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Christopher J. Maier

CHRISTOPHER J MAIER MAIER & MAIER, PLLC345 South Patrick StreetALEXANDRIA, VA 22314-3512UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029Meat, fish, poultry and game; preserved, dried and cooked fruits and vegetables; jellies, jamsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
030Coffee, tea, cocoa, bread, pastry, sweets and chocolates, edible ices; honey, mustard; vinegar, sauces, dressings for salads; spicesSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
043Restaurant and catering servicesSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 19, 2018DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Apr 19, 2018DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Jan 29, 2018REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED—
Apr 9, 2014TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
May 18, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 29, 2013FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Apr 29, 2013FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Apr 29, 2013FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jan 29, 2013R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Nov 24, 2012GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 13, 2012PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 24, 2012OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Oct 24, 2012OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Oct 24, 2012NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Oct 11, 2012PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Oct 11, 2012ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 27, 2012CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 21, 2012NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - MAILED—
Sep 21, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 20, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 20, 2012TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 20, 2012PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Sep 20, 2012PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Aug 2, 2012MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Aug 2, 2012ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 6, 2012RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 22, 2011RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Dec 22, 2011RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Dec 22, 2011RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Dec 21, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 20, 2011MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Dec 14, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 14, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Dec 12, 2011LIMILIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED—
Dec 9, 2011SDRCSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance